When your Porsche keeps returning to the...
Receiving an insurance reservation of ri...
You’ve probably heard about Uber’s $...
You bought or leased a Toyota expecting a dependable vehicle. But repeated dealership visits, recurring warning lights, or the same problem returning after repairs can undermine that confidence.
If your defective Toyota vehicle remains under the manufacturer’s warranty and Toyota has been unable to repair a problem after a reasonable number of attempts, California’s Lemon Law may provide a remedy.
A California Toyota lemon law lawyer can review your warranty and repair history, determine whether you may have a claim, and pursue a buyback or replacement when appropriate.
California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act provides protections for qualifying vehicles that cannot be repaired to conform to the manufacturer’s express warranty after a reasonable number of attempts.
The California Department of Consumer Affairs explains that Lemon Law protections apply to most new vehicles purchased or leased in California while covered by the manufacturer’s new-vehicle warranty. The law may also cover used vehicles when a manufacturer’s new-car warranty is issued with the sale.
A Toyota lemon law claim may be possible when:
A recurring problem does not necessarily mean a Toyota qualifies as a lemon. Factors such as the defect, repair history, warranty coverage, and how long the vehicle has been out of service can affect a claim. See our ultimate guide to California Lemon Law for more information.
Depending on the model and model year, Toyota and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) records have documented problems involving major vehicle systems and components.
Examples include:
Hybrid battery issues, electrical problems, charging-system malfunctions, and vehicle software can add another layer of complexity to some Toyota Lemon Law claims. Learn more about how software and infotainment problems may affect a Lemon Law claim.
A recall does not necessarily mean your Toyota qualifies as a lemon. You can use the NHTSA’s recall tool to check whether your vehicle has any open safety recalls.
California law does not impose the same repair-attempt requirement for every Lemon Law claim. The question is whether the manufacturer had a reasonable opportunity to repair a warranty-covered defect.
California Civil Code Section 1793.22 establishes a rebuttable presumption for certain qualifying vehicles. Among other requirements, the defect must arise within 18 months after delivery or 18,000 miles, whichever occurs first.
| Circumstance | Lemon Law Presumption |
|---|---|
| Defect likely to cause death or serious bodily injury | 2 or more repair attempts |
| Same qualifying nonconformity | 4 or more repair attempts |
| Vehicle unavailable because of repairs | More than 30 cumulative calendar days |
Circumstance: Defect likely to cause death or serious bodily injury
Lemon Law Presumption: 2 or more repair attempts
Circumstance: Same qualifying nonconformity
Lemon Law Presumption: 4 or more repair attempts
Circumstance: Vehicle unavailable because of repairs
Lemon Law Presumption: More than 30 cumulative calendar days
These rules create a statutory presumption, not minimum requirements for every claim. A Toyota may still qualify based on its repair history and other circumstances.
Keep every repair order, even when the dealership cannot duplicate the problem. These records can document the reported defect, attempted repairs, and time out of service.
When a manufacturer cannot repair a qualifying vehicle after a reasonable number of opportunities, California law may require replacement or restitution.
A qualifying repurchase can include amounts paid toward the vehicle, subject to deductions and adjustments allowed by law. The exact calculation depends on the circumstances, including when the problem was first presented for repair.
A Toyota buyback lawyer can review the repair history and explain how California’s repurchase provisions may apply to the claim.
California law also provides for replacement of a qualifying vehicle. The consumer does not have to accept a replacement instead of restitution.
A statutory Lemon Law replacement or repurchase is separate from any voluntary Toyota buyback program.
California law also permits a buyer to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs in qualifying Song-Beverly litigation.
Good records can make it much easier to evaluate a potential Toyota warranty lawsuit or claim. If a problem keeps returning:
If a defect affects steering, braking, power delivery, or another safety-critical system, follow the manufacturer’s instructions and obtain appropriate repairs rather than continuing to drive an unsafe vehicle simply to build a Lemon Law record.
Toyota may dispute the severity of a defect, the repair history, or whether it had a reasonable opportunity to fix the problem.
A Toyota lemon law lawyer can:
Together, these steps can help establish the defect, repair history, and Toyota’s response.
The Shirvanian Law Firm represents Toyota owners and lessees with recurring defects and warranty problems throughout California. Our Burbank office is one of several locations serving consumers statewide. A California Toyota lemon law attorney can review your waranty, repair orders, and service history and explain your options.
If your Toyota remains under warranty and the dealership has been unable to correct a recurring problem, contact us for a free consultation to discuss whether California Lemon Law may apply and what steps may come next.
Some claims resolve through negotiations, while disputed claims or litigation can take longer. The repair history, Toyota’s response, and procedural requirements can affect the timeline.
A Toyota Lemon Law claim may resolve without a trial. However, if the manufacturer disputes liability or the appropriate remedy, litigation may become necessary.
A vehicle with a non-safety-related problem may remain usable, but you should not continue driving if the defect makes the Toyota unsafe. Follow safety warnings and repair recommendations, and continue keeping records of recurring warranty problems.
California Civil Code §§ 1790–1795.8 — Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act
California Legislature — Consumer Warranty Protection
California Civil Code § 1793.22 — Tanner Consumer Protection Act
California Civil Code § 1793.22
To learn more, or to inquire about or contingency fees, contact The Shirvanian Law Firm at (866) 724-0263